fred

thank you van it will take a while to digest all of this info but I am willing to apply all of this info so as not to be left in the dark like i said after 2 years of trying to come up with the best rwin for my paticular computer it is worth the invested time

Happy Holidays van the man that is very correct however if your isp has turned off the icmp ping options in their net work how can you effectively calculate latency for max rwin values in other words that is exactly what my isp has done to me as to not recieve the denial of service attacks that our network has been plaqued with in recent months or they could be just pumping smoke up my ass also I know if you change mtu in the tcp optimizer program it will ask you to return to a mtu of 1500 but I can only set the amount of data to be sent at 995 bits of data or it will start to defrag at any amount higher, strange could you educate me on latency and Rwin or : explain 1492 mtu for PPPoe which is set by the isp or 576 for dial up I really do'nt know or understand some of these formulas and they have kind of all melted together after 2 years of trying to get top performance out of this &{;" thing

I want to appoligze to the forum for not reading this gents posting at the get go because cable and dsl is for sure different, there is no distance requirements on cable I was relating to a problem I had with DSL and SBC in the ST. Louis Mo. area a few years back how ever the path is the same

:D I have a program that is called a Rwin calculator it is made by Big Amp if some body will help me to post the file anyone is welcome to it maybe I can do a screen shot of it and somebody may recognize it this program has mtu mss and rwin :D

:Double nickles on 01/27/05

there are several things that happen with dhcp 1. authorization 2. hand shake and then you sync up. as mentioned before the isp is definetly at fault here be cause you can't sync up and in xdsl you have 3 or 4 different types of protocall 1.ppp 2.pppoe 3.ppoe ras so on and so on. what I hear here is no upload so your isp is at fault they need to re check the distance of your central office sounds to me like your on the fringe of dsl distance acceptance

Adapt

yes I made a mention to that fact about a month ago. Not only upload but download speeds are greater also, it must be in the way they wrote their program,code,script what ever it is called, as i recall i do'nt believe anybody replyied to that topic. Anyway it is remarkable on how much faster it is than the unsecure MSIE browser. Security is the reason that I changed to the FF browser in the first place, and that is where I became aware of the marked speed increases. Thanks Fred Merry Christmas to all of you good pepole on our site.

OK the key phrase here is " If Your not going to use Your head You might as well have 2 that is two assholes " and by the way I do both of my brothers and he was the one that was going to stick his ass out Thanks and Happy holiday's to the Forum

thanks guys U have all been so very helpful do I owe any body anything If so HaHa

I don't guess anybody want's to touch this one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

sorry to be a little late but a simple program I think mite work is net meeting v3.0

this question is to all of you cable guy's is it possible to by pass the dslam with out getting any body that work's at my local teleco in a jam with their boss this may not be possible but I am going to ask one of my friends with any of yours advise thanks Fred

that is 90% of my connection advertised speed, which by the way is 1200dn&256up so in essence I am getting what I am paying for, however it is costly to the note of $65.00 a month and that is what upsets me, they (my isp) has the market cornered and there is only one alternative and that is satellite which their speeds are still even slower let's face it Peep I'am

ya know swimmer and van the man you guy's send out a lot of good info yourselves and that is time consuming and takes effort and this kind of sharing is what is going to make our site a real winner in the long run. I have learned a lot of valuable info myself on this one topic, thanks Fred also as time passes you new members will also learn as we have and you will be able to share as we have and it makes you feel good to be able to help some one else

I think they finnally fixed my connection also :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 289 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 386 KB) Upload Speed is: 35 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 5 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 29.26 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=OF5P3E1A0 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2029 Kbps about 2 Mbps (tested with 748 KB) Download Speed is:: 248 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 36 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 4.13 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=03AKLNJN6

you know mike some of your southeren isp's have gone to turning off their icmp ports so as not to get a (dos) denial of service attack as with my isp. I can't send any packets larger than 996 bytes before the transmission starts to defrag so in reality you can't even set your (mtu) correctly or your (mss) so it is almost impossible to set an accurate Rwin or a snd-win in your tcp/ip stack. so being able to ping with at least 1496 bytes of data is very important also your firewall could be holding you back from reaching your advertised up and downloads. Thanks Fred

sorry about being a dollar short and a2 days late but as for what is being dicussed in this thread I command you Guy for all of your hard work and the people that support you you are very forunate to have the following that you have and what a site by the way very professional and educational this is what the world needs is knowledge because as you know knowledge is power and power is MONEY Thank all of you Guy's out there for sharing one hell of a site, Fred p.s. Shawnee this is for you

thank you microwave as you stated this is an educational site, among other things like arousal this is good info you taught me something Ive never saw before and if I see this program on another computer I will know what this person is up to and will beable to avoid his or hers company, and also keep an eye on them again thanks for your lesson, Fred

Guy I have been with you a long time now and as far as advertiseing I have probally checked out more of your ads than any other site because of what you have to offer most sites all have your generic ads but you are demographicly on time. In other words they appeal to my interests as they do with the rest of our members. Keep up the hard work and you will enjoy going Public

this subject has brought a lot of good information to the fore front. As I have been surfing and trying to make my computer more secure and faster I have been playing with different browsers and have found out that different browesers bring different download speeds and quite substantial speeds. I've always known that speeds change with the load of data on the pipeline but I am amazed with this difference, thanks again for all the helpful information keep up the good work

thanks a lot for clarifying this protocall Guy it is surely a lot more advantageous to use atm but the standard has already been set thanks again for all of the info till next time Fred

Is there anybody out there that can explain the advantage or disadvantage over this kind of protocall. I understand it could be faster if it is set up right and do we all have the abillity to use this kind of transmission as opposed to tcp/ip or was this technoloige just a brain fart of the internet engineneers? atm (asychronous transfer mode)IP

Hey sarge One more thing try your ping times now and readjust your Rwin accordingly you will be impressed how much a little advise from the community will also improve your speeds

Hey guys swimmer wanted to show his more feminine side (haha)