mudmanc4

Either way is cool, But I must say, the banner is a nice change. A bit bland, but nice. I'm sure you will evolve this even further as time goes on. Nice work CA3LE. " The cloud ", must be everchanging

Yea , I agree, I used the prog for a very short time. Nothing But problems.

Is that a yes or no opinion on norton? mine is no

Damn, I did'nt realize it was a bird till you said so , WOW!

:haha: Laghed my a$$ off, Ive pretty much done the same, but not exactly. :haha:

I agree, ther is always more to learn. this is how we have come so far W/ IT.

Thanks , I'll try this. I just feel that a piece of physical hardware/ applied W/ softwar offers much more controll, Just as anything , take away the controll, and you have chaos!

BTW If you have an always on connection, you may not ever "get anything" , but you could be used as a weapon, or host and never know it . BE UNPINGABLE

Sorry people, you need a hardware firewall!!!!!!!!!!! As well as a software firewall , in my opinion, if for nothing else the software one will advise you of outgoing , this can be VERY important , if you value your privacy. I know these are relativly easy to bypass, this is what the hardware will , if configured properly will prevent!

Yes I would as long as i am runnin an AMD and eatin it . BTW Blonde , Brunet , Red!!!??? all of the above. And it dont matter what Proc they like as long as they are happy, work W what you got !!!

Damn dude , nice climb:)

YOU ARE THE MAN ! Go for it

These people should watch where they tread! It's one thing to attempt to take over a country this size, because you have ruined your own. But to come here and start making demands, desecrating our American flag,and pillaging the national anthem . This to me is an act of war! I Thank our forefathers for the 1st amendment!

Sh*t!!!!!

I love AMD, for many reasons, there only downfall in my opinion is the cache.What is there deal W/ small cache? Good for gaming, but if your multitasking, forget it. My way of testing is to run an internet stream , some sort of simple prog say exel or quickbooks, music W/ video , and lets say rendering something. W/ Intel mostly functional, but AMD........Go make a bowl of popcorn!

Yea, sorry dude, I did'nt realize.

Even if NASA had proof, that Earth would be destroyed, Sh*t, they'd tell us there was'nt, to keep all of us from going apeshit! Could you handle a blue MFr walkin towards ya? :shock:Either way .whatever happens happens!

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5911 Kbps about 5.91 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 722 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/04/27 - 4:40pm Bottom Line:: 103X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.42 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 4.146 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 64.01 % faster than the average for host (adelphia.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-H7YAIRCWJ :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 821 Kbps about 0.82 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Upload Speed is:: 100 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/04/27 - 4:46pm Bottom Line:: 14X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 10.24 sec Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 14.92032 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 74.68 % faster than the average for host (adelphia.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-MV1ZDGXR2 I've done better. but not much

Run Time Download Speed Upload Speed QOS RTT Max Pause 5 16:12:59 5,652,312 bps 889,272 bps 47% 48 ms 73 ms 4 16:12:26 7,082,120 bps 888,656 bps 97% 50 ms 59 ms 3 16:11:53 6,923,016 bps 890,536 bps 92% 45 ms 50 ms 2 16:11:20 4,981,576 bps 891,320 bps 47% 48 ms 87 ms 1 16:10:46 6,177,072 bps 888,072 bps 79% 46 ms 90 ms Does this mean a bad line somewhere? Run Time Download Speed Upload Speed QOS RTT Max Pause 5 16:20:03 6,594,472 bps 888,008 bps 74% 47 ms 72 ms 4 16:19:30 4,961,392 bps 888,472 bps 78% 45 ms 92 ms 3 16:18:57 7,048,320 bps 886,840 bps 96% 48 ms 69 ms 2 16:18:24 6,637,136 bps 902,864 bps 66% 62 ms 80 ms 1 16:17:51 6,461,560 bps 910,912 bps 59% 45 ms 69 ms Hear is a second test.

Yes, thanks for hookin it up Damon! Had to have TMN fix , Sh*t, I was lost for a minute! Look @ the dependency.

Hey PhP, you should be able to get large WU's by /Configure/Advanced/@ bottom, ignore deadlines and no -preference. Or am I missing something?

I agree W/ rich......, The last thing you want is an overheated anything, let alone a power supply. I always vacuum out my system , regularly. keep all component free of dust !

Lookie there , intelligence.PhP. I hear you on that ( gaming), But not for long!My only problem W/ MS is ther influx of more or less ,Spycode. Damn, talk about of a multi-trilliion dollar cache.

Where are are you coming from? At least as far as a good alternative to MS. Have you tried say, Suse ? man dude, this has come a long way , big time.For the stability alone, not counting the "billion" lines of code that freely evolves from good people literally everyday. Good god! Where have you been?

For real, they'll be like the punchcards